Spending & promises
Borrowing money is not the same as earning it back.
Debt adds a timetable and a claim on assets
Financing a purchase is different from earning enough to repay it. The March CoreWeave case follows a staged loan into principal installments, reserve requirements and a limited parent guarantee. Its historical schedule is not a current cash bill.
Funding is another kind of money
The figures below compare company spending. They are not model-lab fundraising, future cloud purchases or contingent guarantees. The financing report follows Amazon and Anthropic, SoftBank’s OpenAI installments and NVIDIA’s infrastructure guarantee, keeping each type separate.
Follow payments, conditions and risk in three authored figures →
Cash paid in the same six months
These are whole-company cash flows for 1 January–30 June 2026, not AI-only accounts. “Property and equipment” means long-lived assets such as servers, buildings and other equipment. Outflows are shown as positive spending. Microsoft’s half-year is calculated from its June fiscal-year total minus the preceding July–December half.
Microsoft
January–June 2026 · whole company
- Cash spent on property & equipment
- $66.7bn
- Cash generated by operations
- $102.1bn
- Operations minus that spending
- $35.4bn
Cash equipment/property spending rose 97.13% from the same six months of 2025. This is not an AI growth rate.
Alphabet
January–June 2026 · whole company
- Cash spent on property & equipment
- $80.6bn
- Cash generated by operations
- $84.9bn
- Operations minus that spending
- $4.3bn
Cash equipment/property spending rose 103.31% from the same six months of 2025. This is not an AI growth rate.
Amazon
January–June 2026 · whole company
- Cash spent on property & equipment
- $98.4bn
- Cash generated by operations
- $71.4bn
- Operations minus that spending
- −$27.0bn
Cash equipment/property spending rose 72.04% from the same six months of 2025. This is not an AI growth rate.
Meta
January–June 2026 · whole company
- Cash spent on property & equipment
- $49.1bn
- Cash generated by operations
- $64.1bn
- Operations minus that spending
- $15.0bn
Cash equipment/property spending rose 66.60% from the same six months of 2025. This is not an AI growth rate.
The last line is a limited subtraction, not a universal definition of free cash flow. It excludes some cash uses, while operating leases and lease interest already affect cash from operations. A positive figure does not prove new AI projects pay back; a negative one does not establish insolvency.
How this differs from each company’s free cash flow
Meta: $64,088m operating cash − $49,113m cash property/equipment purchases − $1,805m lease principal = $13,170m for January–June. That matches its own free-cash-flow reconciliation. Meta reconciliation
Amazon: it nets $2,101m of property-sale proceeds and incentives against $98,411m of gross purchases, giving $96,310m of net purchases. $71,419m operating cash − $96,310m = −$24,891m for January–June. Using gross purchases gives −$26,992m instead. Neither half-year figure should be substituted for Amazon’s separately reported trailing-twelve-month free cash flow. Amazon cash-flow definition
These definitions do not make one company dishonest and another prudent. They mean the reader must check what was subtracted, what was netted and which period is covered before comparing the headline.
Paid now, leased now, promised later
A lease can put equipment or a building on the balance sheet before the company pays most of the money. The initial asset entry and this period’s repayments answer different questions. Adding them together and calling the result “cash spent” counts the wrong things.
Alphabet
In January–June, it reported $840 million of finance-lease principal paid and $902 million of assets obtained through finance leases. A further $835 million of prepayments for leases that had not started is disclosed separately. The cash-classification detail matters; we do not silently fold those prepayments into either column. Source and period
Amazon
In January–June, it reported $863 million of finance-lease principal and $2,128 million of noncash finance-lease equipment additions, the latter net of remeasurements and modifications. Another $174 million of principal on financing obligations is a different category. Source and period
Meta
Its January–June capital-expenditure measure includes $1,805 million of finance-lease principal. The new noncash finance-lease addition flow was not separately recovered from the inspected interim disclosures. A change in the asset balance is not a substitute for that flow. Source and period
Microsoft
For the full fiscal year July 2025–June 2026, it reported $3,101 million of finance-lease principal and $24,608 million of noncash finance-lease additions. The exact January–June equivalents were not recovered, so those annual amounts are not inserted into the half-year comparison. Source and period
What the 2026 spending forecasts mean
Microsoft’s July earnings call lowered its calendar-2026 capital-spending outlook from $190 billion to $175 billion. Management attributed the change to extending the estimated accounting life of buildings and data centers from 15 to 25 years, effective in fiscal 2027. More prospective leases would then be classified as operating rather than finance leases. It said the underlying investment expectation was unchanged excluding that effect. July 29 call
That is not evidence of a $15 billion cash saving, a physical buildout cut or a 25-year GPU life. In the March quarter, management also explained why $31.9bn of reported capex, $4.7bn of finance leases and $30.9bn of cash equipment purchases did not add mechanically: receipt and payment timing differed. March-quarter timing explanation
Alphabet’s July outlook was $195–205bn, up from $180–190bn. Meta’s was $130–145bn, up from $125–145bn, with finance-lease principal included. These are management forecasts with different definitions, not an additive four-company AI bill. Alphabet outlook; Meta outlook
A newer Amazon outlook appeared in secondary search results, but its original supporting call text was not recovered. This page uses verified cash statements rather than calling that numerical outlook primary-verified.
Promises that extend beyond this year
A signed future lease is economically important even before the first payment. It is still not money already spent or a data center already serving customers. These disclosures have different scopes, start dates and terms; they are not added into a sector total.
Microsoft $329.100bn
Leases not yet commenced · as of 30 June 2026
Primarily data centers; expected to start in fiscal 2027–2033, with 1–20-year terms. Some arrangements have conditions. The larger $443.506bn lease-payment table already includes uncommenced leases, so adding this amount again would double count. Lease / commitment note
Alphabet $85.200bn
Leases not yet commenced · as of 30 June 2026
Expected to start in 2026–2031, with 1–26-year terms. It separately describes $5.8bn of short-term lease payments; the definitions must be checked before any aggregation. Lease / commitment note
Amazon $137.214bn
Leases not yet commenced · as of 30 June 2026
Company-wide future lease payments, not just AI or data centers. Its separate $130.065bn unconditional purchase obligations also include energy, content, equipment and software. Lease / commitment note
Meta $278.990bn
Leases not yet commenced · as of 30 June 2026
Expected to start from the remainder of 2026 through 2036, with terms of more than 1 to 30 years. A further $68bn entered in July is a later event, not part of a June-30 snapshot. Lease / commitment note
Purchase commitments, lease payments, contingent maximums and spending already paid have different meanings. For example, Meta’s other non-cancellable commitments include third-party cloud and Reality Labs hardware, while some additional cloud exposure falls when other customers buy capacity. Those categories are not interchangeable “AI capex.” Meta commitment conditions
Money does not tell us how much equipment is earning
Alphabet’s $122.814bn not-yet-in-service assets and Meta’s $80.345bn construction balance at June 30 are stocks of unfinished work. They cannot be added to cash spending or converted into paid AI use. Alphabet; Meta
Read the capacity evidence, including the independent grid check →
Exact data and boundaries
Inspect the complete definitions, numbers and source URLs (JSON) · Open the matched cash table (CSV). These are direct files; use the browser’s save function to keep a copy. Unknown values are null or empty, never zero.
Microsoft’s full-year lease disclosures are kept outside the half-year comparison. Meta’s missing new finance-lease addition flow is unknown, not zero. The source data also distinguish current cash, subsequent events, contingent amounts and purchase obligations.
Debt has more than one kind of backing
A facility ceiling is not principal already borrowed. A parent guarantee is not collateral. The updated CoreWeave case compares two dated parent promises, then keeps June’s dollar and euro note issues separate. It does not add them to an old debt balance.
This is research on an open question, not a prediction of a crash or a personal investment recommendation. The answer so far · Research record